Table of Contents
Description of the Experimental Design
When implementing Iwata’s Experimental analysis process, it is imperative to consider the conditions and procedures of the process. The method comprises the input of several equally essential conditions in the process. The control condition is the first to be incorporated in the experimental design. This aspect of the analysis entails observing the dynamics of the individual’s behavior as applicable in a typical environment. In this stage, the behavior is observed without manipulations of the environment of consequences. Notably, this aspect of the condition will aid in forming the baseline understanding of the individual’s typical behavior (Henry et al., 2021). The second condition to be incorporated into the procedure will include attention. This aspect will include manipulating the environment to provide attention to the individual when engaging in challenging behavior. The third condition will consist of the tangible aspect of manipulating the environment to provide access to the activity when the individual engages in the problematic behavior. Finally, it will comprise the summary condition, which involves observing the challenging behavior a second time and, based on the outcomes, confirming the result of the previous situation. (To get a similar experiment; contact dissertation editing services online)
In implementing the procedures of the experimental analysis, there are some key considerations regarding compassionate approaches. One key approach in this regard included conducting a comprehensive risk assessment to ensure the safety of the individuals who participate in the dissertation chapter. Besides, it was essential that appropriate steps were taken, including reviewing the standards incorporated to ensure that the risks identified had been mitigated effectively. Another key approach taken from the compassionate perspective entailed using the least invasive procedures possible. In this regard, ensuring that the least invasive procedures as possible are utilized to evoke the challenging behavior was essential. More specifically, the approach included using preferred items rather than punishment (Viruses-Ortega, 2021). Guaranteeing the individual’s autonomy and dignity in the experimentation process was also essential. To this end, the decision provided opportunities to make effective choices and participate in the experimental procedure. Finally, the process considered the need for support and follow-up exercises. In the process, this aspect was accomplished by providing relevant information to other stakeholders involved in the analysis. Consequently, this aspect ensured individualized treatment plans and provided support to ensure that all aspects of the intervention were effective as discussed by master’s dissertation.
Part III: Display of Hypothetical Data and Interpreting Results
Robert’s behavior, notably his propensity to flee from the local surroundings during learning circumstances, was evaluated using the Iwata’s experimental analytic technique. There were four different conditions in the experiment: control, focus, material, and abstract. For the sake of comparison, we also ran an experiment in which we just watched how Robert would normally behave in a classroom setting without changing anything about the setting. Robert’s troublesome behavior was rewarded with our attention as part of the attention condition. Whenever Robert exhibited the undesirable behavior, the tangible requirement was fulfilled by granting him access to a desired object. The final condition was a summary observation of Robert’s conduct to verify the findings of the preceding conditions.
|Probability of eloping
Chart 1: The chart below shows the probability of Robert eloping in each of the four conditions.
The results demonstrate that Robert’s attention and access to favored goods were functions of his conduct, since the attention and tangible conditions had the highest odds of eloping. These results are in line with what is expected from an experimental analytic technique like that advocated by Iwata, which aims to pinpoint the specific contextual factors that sustain the problematic pattern of behavior. It is crucial to emphasize that Robert’s well-being and safety were prioritized throughout the whole experimental process, in accordance with the compassion code. It was determined that the techniques utilized were safe for Robert after a thorough risk evaluation was performed. In addition, the method included non-punitive measures, such as facilitating access to desired things. To ensure that Robert’s autonomy and dignity were maintained at all times, he was given the opportunity to make informed decisions and participate in the experimental procedures. Robert received the necessary assistance and follow-up to ensure that his treatment plan was both successful and tailored to his specific needs.
Part 4: Concluding the Experimental Analysis Process
Based on the findings of the functional analysis of the experiment conducted using Iwata’s method, it appears that Robert’s elopement was motivated by a need for attention and material goods. These results were attained by systematically changing Robert’s surroundings and watching his reactions. With Robert’s well-being in mind, we implemented the compassion code principles into the experimental design we used. These findings can be used to guide the creation of a personalised treatment strategy for Robert that replaces his problematic behavior by focusing on its underlying functions.