9 Types of API Attacks Which Are Bad For Your Data

Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) are being used by more and more companies. This poll reveals that 26% of firms utilize at minimum 2 times as many APIs as those used a year before, which has led to an increase in API assaults. Since APIs are essential to any program, hackers often target these. The Top 10 API security exploits linked to API vulnerabilities have been released by the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP), and this blog will analyze them.

Typical API Attacks

Ineffective Access Control.

Because there is a minimal to zero access control mechanism, this is among the most frequent API exploit. Individuals only have access to information that is authorized and are given permission to carry out actions that are allowed thanks to the implementation of an accessibility control strategy. Access control, in a nutshell, guarantees that users cannot operate in violation of restrictions. Data theft, alteration, and destruction occur as a result of the lack of implementation of an accessibility control strategy. When it comes to APIs, unwanted users abusing their privileges might lead to a catastrophic attempt by a malicious attacker.

Attacks through Injection

Injection issues in APIs may allow an intruder to transmit erroneous information to a translator from an unauthorized source via a statement or request. This translator can carry out these risky instructions, giving the intruder access to restricted information. For APIs containing bugs like SQL infiltration, command infusion, and NoSQL injection, as well as others, infusion attempts are a rapidly expanding danger.

DDoS assault.

When a hacker tries to prevent authorized users from accessing a service, resource, or system, the assault is known as a DoS or DDoS attack. Whenever a hacker takes over many systems and sends suspicious queries to overburden the APIs’ storage, this is known as a DDoS assault. This exposes internet shopping platforms to Inventory Denial attacks (IDA).

Attack using a MITM strategy.

MitM attacks include an attacker listening in on conversations between a consumer and the API gateway. Confidential data is stolen and/or altered as a consequence of this conduct. Combining an HTTP flag, a consumer, and an access token-generating API, the hacker may serve like a MitM. By taking this step, the user’s identity and any associated user data are made accessible to the hacker.

User Authentication Issues.

Broken authentication is just an issue with session and credential management gone wrong. Attackers may get unauthorized access to programs when a user authentication mechanism is compromised by using stolen authentication tokens, credential surfing, and brute-force techniques. Users attempting to access apps are identified and approved using API authentication. The security of APIs is affected once authentication is compromised.

Data Exposition.

Data might be exposed when a program is not sufficiently safeguarded by suitable security precautions. Developers, however, depend on client-side screening, which exposes data. Information is available on the platform for everyone (attackers) to view whenever an API doesn’t really filter replies.

Misconfigured security.

Safety configuration errors have a detrimental effect on API safety and create weaknesses. During the discovery process of a cyberattack, these configuration errors enable attackers to learn more about the program. When targeting APIs, attackers make use of security flaws to obtain unauthorized entry into a program and its information.

Unprotected Interactions

Transport layer security (TLS) ought to be employed to safeguard APIs and encourage secure connection between apps since failure to encode data sent between consumer and server might lead to a man-in-the-middle assault.

Unsuitable asset management.

Inadequate asset management may result from the availability of many versions of such an API as well as a developer’s neglect to remove the previous edition. More endpoints are exposed by APIs than by web apps. As a result, they need to be properly recorded and recorded. The attack perimeter for API assaults is increased by accessible debug destinations and out-of-date API releases, which may be reduced by correct setup and maintaining an API registry.

Final thoughts

The threat landscape of the API seems dynamic and constantly changing, and new dangers are identified each day. If any kind of these attacks will happen to your company, without any delay, contact an IT solutions provider company to work simultaneously with your IT team to safeguard your data. It is necessary to have an understanding of the many sorts of typical API attacks as well as be prepared by applying safety best practices in order to protect both your APIs as well as your company.


Leave a Comment